Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16
HP Omen Max 16 comes out ahead overall, scoring 70% to 30% across the categories compared — particularly overall score (5.9 /10 vs 5.2 /10).
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 scored 30%, HP Omen Max 16 scored 70%.
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 is priced around $1299, HP Omen Max 16 around $1579.
How Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 and HP Omen Max 16 Rank
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
AMD Ryzen 7 260 ranks in the top 94% of 45 CPUs we track.
GeForce RTX 5050 ranks in the top 52% of 29 GPUs we track.
DDR5 RAM ranks in the top 75% of 4 RAM types we track.
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) storage interface ranks in the top 50% of 4 storage interfaces we track.
IPS LCD display ranks in the top 60% of 5 display types we track.
Aluminum build ranks in the top 38% of 8 build materials we track.
Wi-Fi 6E ranks in the top 67% of 3 Wi-Fi standards we track.
HP Omen Max 16
DDR5 RAM ranks in the top 75% of 4 RAM types we track.
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) storage interface ranks in the top 50% of 4 storage interfaces we track.
IPS LCD display ranks in the top 60% of 5 display types we track.
Aluminum build ranks in the top 38% of 8 build materials we track.
Wi-Fi 7 ranks in the top 34% of 3 Wi-Fi standards we track.
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Overall Score
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 5.2 /10 | 5.9 /10 |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Build & Design
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Portability score | 6.1 /10 | 5.6 /10 |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.48 kg |
| Thickness | 25.7 mm | 27.69 mm |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Windows Precision touchpad | Yes | Yes |
| Facial recognition | No | No |
| Build material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Available colors | Gray | Black |
| Keyboard | Backlit, Island | Backlit, Monolith |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Cooling system | Active | Active |
| Dimensions | 354 x 269 x 17.9-25.7 mm 13.94 x 10.59 x 0.7-1.01 inches | 356.62 x 268.99 x 22.86-27.69 mm 14.04 x 10.59 x 0.9-1.09 inches |
| Footprint | 952 cm2 (147.6 inches2) | 959 cm2 (148.7 inches2) |
| Touchpad size | 13.0 x 8.5 cm | 12.5 x 8.0 cm |
| Touchpad surface | Plastic | Plastic |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Benchmarks
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Performance score | 6.2 /10 | 8.8 /10 |
| Cinebench (multi-core) | 931 | 1992 |
| Cinebench (single-core) | 109 | 142 |
| Geekbench (multi-core) | 13288 | 17361 |
| Geekbench (single-core) | 2651 | 3282 |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: CPU
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CPU threads | 16 | 20 |
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 7 260 | Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX |
| CPU cores | 8 | 20 (8P + 12E) |
| CPU base frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| CPU turbo frequency | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| CPU L3 cache | 16 MB | 30 MB |
| CPU manufacturing process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU configurations available | AMD Ryzen 7 260 AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: GPU
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| GPU compute | 14.9 TFLOPS | 16.6 TFLOPS |
| GPU | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 5060 |
| GPU type | Dedicated | Dedicated |
| Integrated GPU | Radeon 780M | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) |
| GPU VRAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| GPU memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| GPU configurations available | GeForce RTX 5050|GeForce RTX 5060|GeForce RTX 5070|GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile|GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GeForce RTX 5060 |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Memory
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM upgradable | Yes | Yes |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM clock speed | 5200 MHz | 6400 MHz |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| RAM channels | 2x4 GB | 2x8 GB |
| RAM configurations available | 8GB|16GB|32GB|64GB | 16GB|32GB|64GB |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Storage
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Storage | 512 GB | 1 TB |
| NVMe storage | Yes | Yes |
| Storage upgradable | Yes | Yes |
| Storage type | SSD (M2) | SSD (M2) |
| Storage interface | PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) | PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) |
| Storage configurations available | 512GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB | 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB |
| Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Display
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Display score | 5.3 /10 | 5.4 /10 |
| Display size | 16 in | 16 in |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 1920 x 1200 |
| Screen coating | Matte | Matte |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Contrast ratio | 1157:1 | — |
| sRGB coverage | 59.7% | 100% |
| Response time | 11 ms | 3 ms |
| Screen-to-body ratio | ~77.9% | ~77.4% |
| Side bezels | 4.7 mm | 6 mm |
| Maximum opening angle | 180° | 140° |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Battery
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Battery score | 6.8 /10 | 6 /10 |
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Charging speed | 240 W | 280 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Proprietary charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Network & Connectivity
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 7 /10 | 7.2 /10 |
| Wi-Fi generation | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI port | Yes | Yes |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| USB-A ports | 2x USB 3.2 | 2x USB 3.2 |
| USB-C ports | 2x USB 4.0 | 2x USB 4.0 |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Audio
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
| Speaker configuration | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Speaker loudness | ~79.8 dB | ~77.9 dB |
| Speaker power | 2x2W | 2x2W |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: OS & Software
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs HP Omen Max 16: Extras & Features
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-in-1 convertible | No | No |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD | 1080p FHD |
| Webcam position | Above the display | Above the display |
Where each laptop wins
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
- Portability score: 6.1 /10 (vs 5.6 /10)
- Battery score: 6.8 /10 (vs 6 /10)
- Battery capacity: 90 Wh (vs 83 Wh)
- Weight: 2.2 kg (vs 2.48 kg)
- Thickness: 25.7 mm (vs 27.69 mm)
- Dolby Atmos
HP Omen Max 16
- Overall score: 5.9 /10 (vs 5.2 /10)
- Performance score: 8.8 /10 (vs 6.2 /10)
- Display score: 5.4 /10 (vs 5.3 /10)
- Connectivity score: 7.2 /10 (vs 7 /10)
- Cinebench (multi-core): 1992 (vs 931 )
- Cinebench (single-core): 142 (vs 109 )
- Geekbench (multi-core): 17361 (vs 13288 )
- Geekbench (single-core): 3282 (vs 2651 )
- CPU threads: 20 (vs 16 )
- GPU compute: 16.6 TFLOPS (vs 14.9 TFLOPS)
- RAM: 16 GB (vs 8 GB)
- Storage: 1024 GB (vs 512 GB)
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz (vs 144 Hz)
- Brightness: 400 nits (vs 300 nits)
- Charging speed: 280 W (vs 240 W)
- Vapor chamber cooling
- Wi-Fi generation: 7 (vs 6 )
- Bluetooth version: 5.4 (vs 5.3 )
More Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 and HP Omen Max 16 Comparisons
Laptops Similar to Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 or HP Omen Max 16
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has the better overall score, the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 or the HP Omen Max 16?
The HP Omen Max 16 has the better overall score at 5.9 /10, versus 5.2 /10 on the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608.
Which has the better performance score, the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 or the HP Omen Max 16?
The HP Omen Max 16 has the better performance score at 8.8 /10, versus 6.2 /10 on the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608.
Which has the better portability score, the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 or the HP Omen Max 16?
The Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 has the better portability score at 6.1 /10, versus 5.6 /10 on the HP Omen Max 16.
Which has the better battery score, the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 or the HP Omen Max 16?
The Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 has the better battery score at 6.8 /10, versus 6 /10 on the HP Omen Max 16.