Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 wins 10 of the 12 categories we compared, against 2 for Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 (0 tied) — including overall score (6.6/10 vs 5.2/10).
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: our verdict
Go with TUF Gaming if you want a sharp-looking 16-inch laptop with more CPU, RAM, and storage choices for a much lower price. If your priority is the absolute best performance, graphics, or battery life in this comparison, this isn't the one to get.
For gamers and power users, the Predator Helios Neo is the one that makes sense if you want the best performance, graphics, and battery life here, plus a brighter 400-nit screen and a more comfortable keyboard. If you're mainly trying to get a solid gaming laptop for less money, it's easy to skip.
Summarised from our video comparison of these two laptops.
Watch the video comparison
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Overall Score
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 6.6/10 | 5.2/10 |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Build & Design
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Portability score | 5.9/10 | 6.1/10 |
| Weight | 2.66 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 26.75 mm | 25.7 mm |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Windows Precision touchpad | Yes | Yes |
| Facial recognition | Yes | No |
| Build material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Available colors | Black, Blue | Gray |
| Keyboard | Backlit, Island | Backlit, Island |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Cooling system | Active | Active |
| Dimensions | 356.78 x 275.5 x 13.47-26.75 mm 14.05 x 10.85 x 0.53-1.05 inches | 354 x 269 x 17.9-25.7 mm 13.94 x 10.59 x 0.7-1.01 inches |
| Footprint | 983 cm2 (152.4 inches2) | 952 cm2 (147.6 inches2) |
| Touchpad size | 12.7 x 8.3 cm | 13.0 x 8.5 cm |
| Touchpad surface | Glass | Plastic |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Benchmarks
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Performance score | 8.5/10 | 6.2/10 |
| Cinebench (multi-core) | 1881 | 931 |
| Cinebench (single-core) | 136 | 109 |
| Geekbench (multi-core) | 16562 | 13288 |
| Geekbench (single-core) | 3093 | 2651 |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: CPU
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CPU threads | 20 | 16 |
| CPU | Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | AMD Ryzen 7 260 |
| CPU cores | 20 (8P + 12E) | 8 |
| CPU base frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| CPU turbo frequency | 5.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| CPU L3 cache | 30 MB | 16 MB |
| CPU manufacturing process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU configurations available | Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | AMD Ryzen 7 260 AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: GPU
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| GPU compute | 31.3 TFLOPS | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| GPU | GeForce RTX 5070 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
| GPU type | Dedicated | Dedicated |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 780M |
| GPU VRAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| GPU memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 115 W |
| GPU configurations available | GeForce RTX 5070|GeForce RTX 5070 Ti|GeForce RTX 5080|GeForce RTX 5090|GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce RTX 5050|GeForce RTX 5060|GeForce RTX 5070|GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile|GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Memory
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM upgradable | Yes | Yes |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM clock speed | 6400 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| RAM channels | 2x8 GB | 2x4 GB |
| RAM configurations available | 16GB|32GB|64GB | 8GB|16GB|32GB|64GB |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Storage
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Storage | 1 TB | 512 GB |
| NVMe storage | Yes | Yes |
| Storage upgradable | Yes | Yes |
| Storage type | SSD (M2) | SSD (M2) |
| Storage interface | PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) | PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) |
| Storage configurations available | 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB | 512GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB |
| Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Display
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Display score | 5.4/10 | 5.3/10 |
| Display size | 16 in | 16 in |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 1920 x 1200 |
| Screen coating | Matte | Matte |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Contrast ratio | — | 1157:1 |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 59.7% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 11 ms |
| Screen-to-body ratio | ~75.5% | ~77.9% |
| Side bezels | 6.1 mm | 4.7 mm |
| Maximum opening angle | 160° | 180° |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Battery
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Battery score | 6.2/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Charging speed | 330 W | 240 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Proprietary charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Network & Connectivity
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 7.2/10 | 7/10 |
| Wi-Fi generation | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI port | Yes | Yes |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| USB-A ports | 3x USB 3.2 | 2x USB 3.2 |
| USB-C ports | 2x USB 4.0 | 2x USB 4.0 |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Audio
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
| Speaker configuration | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Speaker loudness | — | ~79.8 dB |
| Speaker power | 2x2W | 2x2W |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: OS & Software
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608: Extras & Features
| Spec |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-in-1 convertible | No | No |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD | 1080p FHD |
| Webcam position | Above the display | Above the display |
Where each laptop wins
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025
- Overall score: 6.6/10 (vs 5.2/10)
- Performance score: 8.5/10 (vs 6.2/10)
- Display score: 5.4/10 (vs 5.3/10)
- Connectivity score: 7.2/10 (vs 7/10)
- Cinebench (multi-core): 1881 (vs 931)
- Cinebench (single-core): 136 (vs 109)
- Geekbench (multi-core): 16562 (vs 13288)
- Geekbench (single-core): 3093 (vs 2651)
- CPU threads: 20 (vs 16)
- GPU compute: 31.3 TFLOPS (vs 14.9 TFLOPS)
- RAM: 16 GB (vs 8 GB)
- Storage: 1024 GB (vs 512 GB)
- Refresh rate: 180 Hz (vs 144 Hz)
- Brightness: 400 nits (vs 300 nits)
- Charging speed: 330 W (vs 240 W)
- Facial recognition
- Bluetooth version: 5.4 (vs 5.3)
- SD card reader
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
- Portability score: 6.1/10 (vs 5.9/10)
- Battery score: 6.8/10 (vs 6.2/10)
- Weight: 2.2 kg (vs 2.66 kg)
- Thickness: 25.7 mm (vs 26.75 mm)
- Dolby Atmos
More Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 and Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 Comparisons
Laptops Similar to Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 or Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 or the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608?
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 wins 10 of the 12 categories we compared, against 2 for Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 (0 tied) — including overall score (6.6/10 vs 5.2/10).
Which is cheaper, the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 or the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608?
The Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 costs around $1299, $600 less than the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 at around $1899.
What are the main differences between the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 and the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608?
The biggest gaps are in overall score (6.6/10 on the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs 5.2/10); performance score (8.5/10 on the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI 2025 vs 6.2/10); battery score (6.8/10 on the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs 6.2/10).

